Statewide Programs 2010 Annual Meeting

Statewide Programs 2010 Annual Meeting

Student Evaluation Scores for Courses Delivered by Interactive Videoconferencing Mark Rieger Kirby Barrick Elaine Turner College of Agricultural and Life Sciences University of Florida Statewide Programs = majors taught in 2+ places Interactive Videoconferencing, IVC [Polycom] http://webdev.ifas.ufl.edu/icsvideo/CALSRecruit/CALS_pierce.html

170 Total Students CALS Statewide Programs grad; 39.19% MIL; 9.90% degree-seeking; 38.74% APK; 10.40% FTL; 17.82% non-degree; 22.07%

; 38.61% FTP; 23.27% Ag Ed; 20.97% LNH; 32.26% GEO; 4.84% SWS; 8.06% NRC; 32.26%

FRE; 1.61% IVC usage, UF 2004 2008 215 5695 1

2 Sessions per staff 215 2848 Instruction, as % of total IVC sessions 45%

30% Total IVC sessions Total IT support staff for IVC Source: Office of Academic Tech, UF Changes in delivery platforms, nationwide Year 2001-02 2006-07 Percent of 2 and 4-year institutions using IVC

as the primary delivery platform 70 23 [51% not using it at all] Source: NCES Problems with IVC Evening classes, 3 hrs once/week No technical staff available Attention span Limits course sharing to ~8/week

Dropped audio and/or video signals Poor resolution Student evaluations lower at remote sites Objectives Determine if evaluation scores differ between live and remote sites and if so Is the magnitude of the difference large enough to: affect faculty performance evaluations warrant a change in DE delivery technology

Methods Convenience sample of student evaluations: 22 cases during 2005-08 10 different instructors representing 4 sites 14 different courses 1 course 3x, 6 courses 2x Stats: non-parametric Wilcoxan signed rank test on differences [live remote] Results

From 2005-2008, n=22 Results 10. Instructor overall 11. Course overall Live site 4.59 4.44 CALS mean (Fall 2008) 4.35

4.16 Remote site 4.28 4.01 From 2005-2008, n=22 Discussion Faculty were right!

All ratings were close to college-wide means Practical significance? Serious disadvantage? Reasonable for faculty to address the issue Discussion Results agree with: Clow (1999), Chisholm et al. (2000) lower evaluations at remote than live with IVC. Results disagree with: Spooner et al. (1999) IVC has no consistent effect on student evaluation scores.

Is it the technology per se or the pedagogy/methodology that goes with? Conclusions IVC affects evaluation scores, but Statewide faculty are doing a great job despite technology Switch evaluation forms? (Roberts et al. 2005) separates technology from teaching Switch platforms go online Less problematic than IVC Reach new markets

Student satisfaction equal or higher (Allen et al. 2002, Bernard et al. 2004) Student achievement higher (Bernard et al. 2004, DOE 2009) Statewide Programs 2010 Annual Meeting Vision Statement Transform current programs to predominantly asynchronous, internet-based course delivery over three years Blended programs: Online + Critical Live

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • THE VLE THAT MAKES TEACHING & LEARNING EASIER

    THE VLE THAT MAKES TEACHING & LEARNING EASIER

    Retrieve previous years content/feedback from SunSpace. If you think you will need access to materials from previous years, access these now and save anything for use outside of SunSpace. December 31st - SunSpace is shut down by the vendor and...
  • Progressive Design-Build: Examining the Structure, Procurement and Contracting

    Progressive Design-Build: Examining the Structure, Procurement and Contracting

    Statutory restrictions . Mandates that overall price be provided at time of contract. Constraints on hiring and integrating subcontractors. Owner interest in: Obtaining a competitive fixed price for entire project during procurement. Developing detailed technical requirements prior to starting procurement
  • Chapter 1, Heizer/Render, 5th edition - UTEP College of ...

    Chapter 1, Heizer/Render, 5th edition - UTEP College of ...

    © 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved. 2-Lecture slides to accompany. Engineering Economy. 7. th. edition. Leland Blank. Anthony . T. arquin. Chapter
  • Digitization and Repatriation - GBIF

    Digitization and Repatriation - GBIF

    - All B-O-group members in some way and to different degree involved in digitization activities (projects or not) and acknowledge this activity as being fundamental for access to historically geographically and taxonomically distributed data and their repatriation.
  • Two Questions . . . What is IB?

    Two Questions . . . What is IB?

    Global Contexts & The "Octagon" ... MYP in Hillsborough County offers greatest likelihood of your child having the IB experience. Earlier hours - 7:35 to 2:55pm - AM & PM H.O.S.T. Added points on high school magnet applications and selection...
  • 12/15/14

    12/15/14

    4/16/15 WARM UP. Pull out your answers to the practice AIMs test, If you didn't finish, quickly finish. Those done, help pass back papers. Pull out labs for me to grade.
  • gimmenotes.co.za

    gimmenotes.co.za

    Models of Curriculum Development. The best or one of the best known models for curriculum development with special attention to planning phases is Ralph W. Tyler's in his classic little book, Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. The Tyler Model
  • Essentials of Sociology: A Down-To-Earth Approach

    Essentials of Sociology: A Down-To-Earth Approach

    Structural social mobility. Shift in social position of large numbers of people. Due more to societal changes than to individual efforts. Ideology. Cultural beliefs that justify particular social arrangements, including patterns of inequality.